🔍 Firm comparisons

A Deep Comparison of Prop Firm Scaling Plans — The Conditions and Strategy for Growing an Account to $2M-$4M

Published: 6/20/2026

※ Scaling conditions, caps, and profit splits vary enormously between firms and are revised frequently (FundedNext overhauled its plan in January 2026). Always confirm the current figures on each firm's official site. (Last updated: June 20, 2026)

TL;DR: your account grows on "10% profit + a payout track record"

Scaling is the mechanism that grows a funded account's size in stages. Accounts can grow to as much as $2M-$4M.

  • The entry threshold is roughly 10% profit (ranges 5-15%, varies widely by firm)
  • There are two types: "time-based" and "target-triggered" (doubling)
  • Making profit alone often isn't enough — completing a set number of payouts is usually also a requirement
  • After scaling up, the DD allowance also grows, but the golden rule is keeping your risk percentage unchanged

1. The two types of scaling

TypeMechanismRepresentative firms
Time-basedIncreases the size on review after a fixed period, e.g. 4 monthsFTMO, FundedNext
Target-triggeredScales up the instant you hit 10% (no time constraint, often doubles the account)The5ers, Funded Trading Plus, Alpha

The target-triggered type lets you move faster if you hit the target quickly.

2. Conditions at major firms (verify these)

FirmConditionIncreaseCapSplit
FTMO4 months + cumulative 10% + 2 payouts + positive balance+25%$2,000,000up to 90%
FundedNext4 consecutive months of 10% + 2 payouts + a positive final month+40%$4,000,000—
The5ers Hyper GrowthEvery time you hit 10%2x (doubling)$4,000,00050% → 75% → 100%
Funded Trading Plus10% at each level (doubling)2x$2,500,00080% → 90% → 100%
Alpha Capital10% growth+10% of initial balance$2,000,000up to 90%
FundingPips10% at each stage + 4 payouts+20-40% / doubles at the final stage$2,000,000up to 100%

Sources: FTMO · FundedNext · The5ers · Funded Trading Plus · Alpha Capital

⚠️ FundedNext overhauled its scaling program on January 12, 2026. Which rules apply depends on your purchase date. Search results mix the old standard (4 consecutive months of 10%) with the new program, so always confirm the current figures officially.

3. The easily overlooked "payout track record" requirement

The single most important point here. Making profit alone doesn't get you scaled up.

  • FTMO requires 2 payouts, FundingPips requires 4, and FundedNext requires 2 Performance Rewards
  • In other words, the gate is "the number of times you've actually received a split"
  • Simply letting profit accumulate in the account doesn't satisfy the requirement

Furthermore, Alpha Capital requires you to withdraw all profit and bring the balance back to the initial value to apply. Don't assume "leave the profit in and it scales up automatically" — that's not always how it works.

4. "Flat increase" vs. "doubling" types

  • Flat-increase type (FTMO +25%, FundedNext +40%): grows steadily
  • Doubling type (The5ers, Funded Trading Plus): $12,500 → $25,000 → $50,000... compounds, so the speed to reach a target grows exponentially

However, the doubling type requires a fresh 10% at each level (no carrying over past progress). As the level rises, 10% of a larger absolute amount gets harder to clear, raising the bar each time.

5. Things to watch out for

  • Meeting the requirements doesn't mean automatic scaling. Funded Trading Plus explicitly states it retains discretion to deny scaling through a Risk Review even after requirements are met. Sloppy trading can get turned down
  • The DD allowance grows proportionally after scaling up, but using the full expanded allowance is a classic overconfidence mistake. Taking on too much risk right after scaling up is the single most common way to blow a scaled account
  • Keep risk fixed as a percentage: if it's $200/trade (0.8%) on $25K, on $50K it should scale proportionally to $400 — maintain the percentage, not the absolute amount
  • Consistency rules interact with scaling: if a single day's profit is too large a share of total profit, it's a violation. A single big win can actually work against your scaling eligibility (see the Complete guide to consistency rules)
  • Accounts expire with no trading (30 days at The5ers). No time limit doesn't mean it's fine to leave it idle

6. How to play it to maximize scaling

Code
1. First build a setup that lets you withdraw steadily (a track record is the scaling condition)
2. Spread profit across multiple days (guard against consistency rules — don't create one big win)
3. Keep risk fixed as a percentage. Stay around 0.5% even after scaling up
4. Don't raise risk right after scaling up (overconfidence is the biggest failure mode)
5. With a target-triggered plan, clear 10% as fast as possible to accelerate the doubling

FAQ

Q. Does the account grow automatically if I make profit?

Usually not. FTMO requires 2 payouts, FundingPips requires 4 payouts, and so on — an actual track record of withdrawals is the scaling condition. Simply letting profit accumulate doesn't satisfy the requirement.

Q. Which is better, time-based or target-triggered?

If speed matters most, go with the target-triggered (doubling) type. You can scale up the instant you hit 10%. The time-based type (FTMO/FundedNext) requires waiting for a review after a period like 4 months. That said, conditions, caps, and discretion vary a lot by firm, so always verify.

Q. Should I increase lot size as the account grows?

Keep the risk percentage fixed and only scale the absolute amount proportionally: $200 → $400 going from $25K to $50K. Using the full expanded DD allowance is a classic overconfidence mistake and the most common way to blow a scaled account.

Q. Does a big win get me scaled up faster?

Often, the opposite. Consistency rules penalize an outsized single day's profit, which can block scaling eligibility or payouts. The design rewards a steady approach that spreads profit across many days.

Written by

Hosono P | the prop firm strategist

I buy challenges with my own money and record everything through to the payout. Recorded payouts: ¥6.1M in total from Fintokei, Fundora and Funded7, plus $4,776 from The5ers (as of September 2026). Author of the semi-discretionary EA "ELDRA".

Profile and payout recordX @hosono_p

📚Related articles

🔍

Is E8 Pro Good for Account Rotation? It Looks Like the Ideal 'No Consistency Rule, Daily Payouts' Setup - Until the 50% Buffer Kicks In

Which plan is best suited to account rotation - running one account at a time toward a small target, then moving to the next once you hit it? E8 Pro has no consistency rule, no minimum trading days, daily payouts, and a 1% minimum profit - conditions that line up almost as if they were built for rotation. Even the infamous "2% daily profit cap" simply doesn't come into play when you're rotating toward small targets. But there's a trap in the payout mechanism: even after requesting a payout, you only receive half of your profit. On top of that, the static drawdown permanently shifts to your starting balance on your first payout. We compared E8 Pro against Breakout Prop and The5ers across six angles. Verified against official help articles on September 17, 2026.

Firm comparisons9/17/2026
🔍

FTMO Futures vs Topstep: FTMO Wins on Expected Value, Topstep Wins on Monthly Cost. If You're Running a Bot, VPS Access Is the Deciding Factor [September 2026]

We re-confirmed the rules on both the futures prop leader Topstep and FTMO Futures, which entered the market in September 2026, on September 23, 2026, and compared them. The monthly fee is less than half at Topstep, but running the same lot size through evaluation to payout for a year gives FTMO Futures Pro the higher expected value ($50K, zero edge: +$4,836 vs. +$2,519). Covers activation fees, the fact that you can only withdraw 50% of the balance, an optional daily loss limit, resets that shift your billing date, VPS eligibility, and running a bot on a live account.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
🔍

E8 Pro vs E8 One: Which Should You Buy? Comparing "Static 8% + 2%/day cap" vs "Dynamic 6% + 40% Consistency" at the Same $366, for Both Smoothed and Spiky P&L [September 2026]

E8 Markets' E8 Pro (static DD 8%, daily 2.5%, daily profit cap 2%, payouts are 50% of profit and the fail line moves to the starting balance) and E8 One (dynamic DD 6% locked at the starting balance, daily 4%, target 9%, 40% consistency rule in Performance stage) both cost $488 at $100K — $366 with code E8. The answer depends on the shape of your P&L. Traders firing multiple times a day to smooth out returns come out ahead with Pro in Monte Carlo (4.5x vs 1.4x at zero edge). Traders who trade once a day and earn most of their profit from a handful of big days come out 2–7x ahead with One in real-data tests (+¥3.09M/+¥5.85M vs +¥630K/+¥1.37M per year). The reason: Pro's "2% daily profit cap" shaves 8–27% off big-day profits, and the buffer disappears on the first payout. Also covers which configuration to pick (8% for Pro, 6% for One).

Firm comparisons9/20/2026
🔍

Web3 Prop Firms Special [September 2026] | Sorting 22 Firms — from On-Chain Settlement to Exchange-Backed and Prediction-Market Types — by 'Is This Actually On-Chain?'

New prop firms settling on Hyperliquid or Arbitrum surged in 2026. We checked 22 firms on September 20, 2026, against their official rulebooks, terms of service, and Trustpilot — from the on-chain settlement type (Propr, Hypernova, HyperPNL, Carrot, DojiFunded), the chain-recorded type (Vanta, Hyper Stack, Solana Funded), the on-chain payout type (Investabl, FundedHive, AI Prop), Kraken-owned Breakout / Kraken Prop / Kraken Funded, the crypto-native type (SizeProp, HyroTrader, Crypto Fund Trader, Bitfunded, TradeXProp, Upscale), to the prediction-market type using Polymarket (Funding Predicts, PropMarket). Even firms calling themselves 'on-chain' run every evaluation phase as a simulation, and each firm's terms state that whether real orders get routed to the market after funding is entirely 'at the operator's discretion.' We cover whether you can buy from Japan, what to do once you receive USDC, and where the fees hit.

Firm comparisons9/20/2026
🔍

Breakout Prop vs. Fintokei: Which Should You Buy? 'Narrow Room, No Rules' vs. 'Wide Room, Many Rules'

A head-to-head comparison of Breakout Prop, the Kraken-backed crypto prop firm, against Fintokei, the firm that runs end-to-end in Japanese. The fee as a percentage of account size is nearly identical (Breakout Pro 0.545% vs. Fintokei Sapphire 0.549%), but the substance is opposite. Breakout has just two rules — daily loss and max drawdown — with no consistency rule, no minimum trading days, and no per-trade risk cap, but its max drawdown is a narrow 3–6%. Fintokei has a wide 10% max drawdown, but a cap on floating loss at 3% of balance applies to the sum of all open positions. Looking at target ÷ max drawdown, how easy it is to pass differs by 1.7x to 3.3x. Measured on both official sites on September 16, 2026.

Firm comparisons9/16/2026
🔍

Only Two Prop Firms Can Actually Run Grid/Trailing-Repeat EAs: "Not Banned" and "Usable" Are Different Things

If you want to run a grid or trailing-repeat ("trailing stop and repeat" / トラリピ) type EA on a prop account, checking only whether the ban list mentions it doesn't tell you anything. What actually kills the account is the "floating-loss cap" and whether drawdown is measured on equity or on balance. City Traders Imperium's 1-Step is the unique combination of balance-based DD, no daily DD, off-the-shelf EAs allowed, and grid explicitly permitted. Fintokei doesn't list grid among its 9 banned practices, but off-the-shelf EAs aren't allowed and a combined 3% cap across all open positions becomes the real limit on how many grid levels you can run. A comparison table across 10 firms, plus the formula for working backward from the floating-loss cap to figure out how many levels you can stack. Confirmed against each firm's official help center on September 16, 2026.

Firm comparisons9/16/2026