Consistency rule fully explained: how it's calculated, which firms use it, and techniques to avoid tripping it

⚠️ ATFunded announced a service suspension on June 8, 2026 (no new challenge purchases). The ATFunded details in this article are a record of the rules before the suspension. For the background and how refunds/payouts are being handled, see the summary article.

📢 Ad / affiliate disclosure: This article contains prop-memo.com affiliate links (Fintokei / Funded7, marked with 🎁). If you buy a challenge through one of these links, I'll give you unlimited use of my semi-discretionary EA, "ELDRA," as a gift. See Hosono P (ホソノP)'s note article for details.

Note: prop firm rules change frequently. Always check each firm's official site for the latest accurate rules. (Last updated: May 16, 2026)

What is the consistency rule

The consistency rule is a mechanism prop firms use to check whether a trader's profit is too concentrated on one day. The typical formula is:

Profit on the best day ÷ total profit ≤ threshold (20% / 30% / 40%, etc.)

Example:

• Total profit at the time of passing the phase: $10,000
• Profit on the best day: $3,500
• Ratio: 35%
• At a firm with a 30% threshold, this is a violation; at a 40% threshold, it's fine

The penalty for a violation is usually just "your withdrawal request isn't approved, and you wait until you meet the condition" — an account rarely gets breached outright (though repeated violations can lead to a warning, then suspension).

In short, the consistency rule exists to filter out traders who swing for one big win and run. It's designed to favor traders who build up steadily, day by day.

Why the consistency rule exists

From the prop firm's perspective:

1. A structure where one big win lets you cash out is an operational risk — they don't want to hand out capital only to lucky traders
2. It filters out probabilistic, gambling-style trading — full-leverage, coin-flip-style methods are long-run losers
3. It protects the health of the funding model — firms often filter trader flow through their own servers before it hits the real market, so probability-dependent trades are an in-house business risk

So from the trader's side, it's "a rule made for the operator's convenience," but in the sense that following it lets you withdraw with a clean conscience, it's a fair design.

Formulas and examples by threshold

20% threshold (strictest)

Mostly used by futures-focused props. Almost never seen among FX props aimed at Japanese traders.

Best day ≤ total profit × 20%

Example: with $10,000 total profit, one day's profit is capped at $2,000. Go over, and your withdrawal is delayed. You need to build profit evenly across at least 5 days — quite cramped.

30% threshold (the common one)

The most common. Used by many firms, including Fintokei and Funded7.

Best day ≤ total profit × 30%

Example: with $10,000 total profit, one day's profit is capped at $3,000. In practice, this is relatively easy to stay within.

40% threshold (loose)

Only used by some firms — a business model that eases up on consistency.

Best day ≤ total profit × 40%

Example: with $10,000 total profit, one day's profit is capped at $4,000. A big win in a single day is within the tolerance.

Above 50% (effectively none)

Almost no firm uses this — a rule that loose can't really be called a "consistency" rule.

Consistency rules by firm

※ Always confirm the latest rules on each firm's official site.

Choosing a firm with no consistency rule, or one at 50%+ (loose) means a big-win strategy is viable. Firms with a 30% threshold, on the other hand, effectively force a style of spreading out risk and building steadily day by day.

3 worked calculation examples

Let's walk through 3 patterns of how this is actually calculated.

Example 1: staying within the 30% threshold (withdrawal OK)

Profit over 10 days ($):
Mon: $500
Tue: $800
Wed: $1,200
Thu: $600
Fri: $900
Mon: $700
Tue: $400
Wed: $1,100
Thu: $500
Fri: $800

Total profit: $7,500
Best day: $1,200 (Wed)
Ratio: $1,200 / $7,500 = 16%

Completely fine at a 30% threshold. The withdrawal request would be approved.

Example 2: violating the 30% threshold

Profit over 10 days ($):
Mon: $200
Tue: $300
Wed: $400
Thu: $3,500  ← big win on NFP
Fri: $200
Mon: $100
Tue: $100
Wed: $200
Thu: $200
Fri: $300

Total profit: $5,500
Best day: $3,500 (Thursday's NFP)
Ratio: $3,500 / $5,500 = 64%

64% → a major violation. The withdrawal request would be rejected and held.

Example 3: additional trades to clear the violation

Starting from Example 2's state, you can clear the violation over the following weeks by stacking small profits to bring the ratio down:

5 more days: $500 profit each day
Additional profit: $2,500

New total profit: $5,500 + $2,500 = $8,000
Best day stays the same: $3,500
New ratio: $3,500 / $8,000 = 43.75%

Still over 30%. You'd need $4,100 more in profit ($3,500 / ($5,500 + $4,100 + $2,500) = 29.7%).

In other words, diluting one big win takes a substantial amount of additional trading. Hitting it big on NFP isn't something you get to enjoy outright at consistency-rule firms — that's just the nature of the beast.

How the reset-at-payout mechanic works in practice

At many firms, the consistency check resets once a withdrawal is processed. In other words:

• Up to the first withdrawal after passing the phase: checked on a cumulative basis
• After the first withdrawal completes: recalculation starts fresh, using "new profit made since this withdrawal"
• It resets the same way after every subsequent payout

Because of this mechanic, after a withdrawal, going back to stacking small wins might let a future big win slide through again.

A violation isn't the end of the account

A consistency violation basically just delays a withdrawal.

• DD violation: the account is breached immediately
• Consistency violation: the account stays alive — only the withdrawal has to wait

Don't panic and think "oh no, I might lose everything" — you can usually resolve it just by stacking small profits to bring the ratio down.

That said, repeated violations or an extreme violation (a ratio over 80%, etc.) do carry some risk of a warning → account review → suspension, so it's worth keeping this in mind from the start.

Lot-sizing techniques to stay within the consistency rule

Technique 1: keep lot size / risk uniform

Fix the risk (loss amount) on every trade at 0.5–1%. Don't act like a bulk trader taking 5% risk on a single trade.

Technique 2: cap your daily profit

Impose 10–15% of the phase's profit target as your own daily profit cap.

Example: $100K account, 8% target ($8,000)

• Daily target: $800–$1,200
• Assume you'll pass within 40 days (steadily stacking $200–$300 a day)

Building at this pace comfortably keeps you within a 30% threshold.

Technique 3: spread out when you take profit

Even on the same trade, split your take-profit into stages:

• 1/3: +10 pips
• 1/3: +20 pips
• 1/3: +30+ pips

If the same trade crosses into the next day, it counts as a separate day, so combining a swing position with partial same-day profit-taking naturally spreads your profit out. For details, see Scalping / news rules compared.

Technique 4: adjust weekend positions

At firms that allow news trading and weekend holding, you can turn Monday's opening gap into profit via a weekend position. Since crossing into a new week counts as "a different day's profit," this naturally helps you stay within the consistency rule. See Scalping / news rules compared for details.

Technique 5: monitor the ratio in real time with the EA Tracker

Using prop-memo.com's /pnl dashboard, you can graph the ratio between daily profit and cumulative profit. Get an alert as you approach the consistency threshold, then manually adjust your trading pace.

Choosing a firm with no consistency rule

If you'd rather not worry about the consistency rule, pick from these:

Firms with none, or a loose 50%+ threshold

• The5ers (no explicit consistency rule)
• FTMO (no explicit consistency rule)
• FundingPips (50%)
• ThinkCapital (50%)
• E8 Markets (none)
• TradingCult (none)

At these firms, dramatic trades like hitting NFP for $3,000 in one shot withdraw without any issue.

Firms with a strict rule

• Fintokei 🎁 (~30%, only after a warning)
• Funded7 🎁 (OREF Rule 1: size consistency + QC 0.90. Real example)
• Fundora (33% consistency)
• ATFunded (50%, tiered)

These are built for traders who build up steadily day by day — not a good fit for anyone playing a short, decisive game.

FAQ

Q. If you win big multiple times in the same day, does that count as a single day?

Yes. Since this is tallied by day, multiple trades within the same day get summed together.

Q. How are losing days treated?

Typically, losing days aren't counted — the ratio is calculated only from profitable days. That said, handling varies by firm, so check the specifics.

Q. How are multiple simultaneously-held positions treated?

Each position is judged by its close time. Even if positions are held simultaneously, if they close on different days, they count separately.

Q. Can you move on to Phase 2 even with a Phase 1 consistency violation?

It depends on the firm. At Fintokei, there are cases where passing Phase 1 itself isn't approved if there's a consistency violation. At Funded7, passing itself is approved, but failing to meet Rule 1 means starting from the Silver tier (2% risk) instead of Gold (3% risk). FTMO has no explicit consistency rule, so this doesn't apply there.

Q. Does the consistency rule actually mean anything?

It matters from the prop firm's side, and for traders it comes with a side benefit of enforcing disciplined trading. It feels cramped in the short term, but some argue the long-term benefits outweigh that.

Related tools on prop-memo.com

• 🔍 Plan comparison / search — filter by whether a consistency rule applies
• 📊 Stats / payout track record — the correlation between consistency strictness and pass rate
• 💰 P&L dashboard — graphs the ratio between daily and cumulative profit
• 🤖 EA Tracker — automatically calculates the consistency ratio and alerts you

The consistency rule is a rule you can follow once you understand it. Rather than avoiding it, it's more rational to learn the mechanics and work with it.