πŸ” Firm comparisons

ATFunded Pauses Operations (June 8, 2026): Refund/Payout Handling and What to Do Now

Published: 7/5/2026

β€» This article is based on official announcements and press reports as of July 5, 2026. For individual refund/payout matters, always follow the guidance from ATFunded's official site and responses from support (support@atfunded.com).

TL;DR

  • On June 8, 2026, ATFunded announced a pause of operations. New challenge purchases were disabled
  • Officially announced: a full refund of the purchase fee for active account holders, and payouts processed as normal for eligible profits on funded accounts
  • MT5 moved to close-only mode (all positions had to be closed by 13:00 EST on the day of the announcement)
  • The stated reason was "a business review to reassess the sustainability of the challenge-fee model." The resumption date is undecided
  • The firm launched in January 2025, so this is a shutdown after roughly 1 year 5 months. The assumption that "it's backed by a major broker, ATFX, so it's safe" didn't hold up

What happened

On June 8, 2026, ATFunded posted an announcement on its official site pausing operations. Here's the breakdown:

ItemDetail
New challenge purchasesSuspended
Active accounts (challenge in progress)Full refund of the purchase fee
Eligible profits on funded accountsPayouts processed as normal (per the profit split, etc.)
Trading environment (MT5)Close-only mode. All positions had to be closed by 13:00 EST on the day of the announcement
Timing of specific refunds/payoutsCommunicated to affected users individually
Contactsupport@atfunded.com

In the official statement, ATFunded described the reason for the pause as a decision to "pause, stabilise, and evaluate alternative models" β€” to look for a model that better balances trader success with the company's sustainability. This is framed as a "pause plus business review," not a shutdown announcement, but the timing and likelihood of resuming are not stated.

Timeline to the pause

TimeEvent
January 2025Launched as a prop firm under ATFX. Low prices starting at $25 drew attention
From early 2025Reputation was solid, with Trustpilot at 4.6 and many reports of payouts within 24 hours
September 2025New purchases from Pakistan suspended, citing a spike in chargebacks
June 8, 2026Pause of operations announced. MT5 switched to close-only

The firm operated for about 1 year 5 months. What stands out here is that there weren't many notable payout-trouble reports right up until the pause β€” it "stopped while its reputation was still intact."

What account holders should do now

1. If you had an active account (challenge in progress)

  • Per the official announcement, you are eligible for a full refund of the purchase fee
  • Check any communication sent to your registered email, including your spam folder
  • If KYC (identity verification) isn't complete, it's likely to hold up the refund process β€” respond promptly once you receive instructions

2. If you had a funded account with profits

  • You are eligible for payout per the rules β€” for eligible profits
  • File a payout request and keep screenshots of the request screen and any emails
  • The determination of "eligible profits" still follows ATFunded's rules as before, so profits can still be cut if there's a suspected rule violation

3. If you haven't received instructions, or haven't been refunded

  • First, email support@atfunded.com in English (include your purchase date, account number, and registered email)
  • If you paid by credit card, a chargeback through your card issuer is also an option. There is a filing deadline (often around 120 days from purchase), so don't wait too long

"Broker-backed prop firm equals safe" didn't hold

ATFunded was a subsidiary of the major broker ATFX, and "the parent company has the capital, so it won't disappear" was one of its selling points. What this pause showed:

  • A parent company's capital is not a reason to keep running a prop business. If the numbers don't work, the company makes a business decision to stop
  • On the other hand, it paused while explicitly committing to refunds and payouts β€” clearly different from a "disappear overnight" scam that vanishes without notice. The credibility of a broker-backed firm showed up not as a "guarantee it won't disappear" but as "it wound down properly"
  • The challenge-fee revenue model itself is under industry-wide pressure to be reconsidered, and closures/reorganizations are likely to continue

When choosing a prop firm, also check the checklist for spotting sketchy firms and the real pass-rate/payout-rate data.

Looking for an alternative?

If you're after something with ATFunded's strengths β€” low prices, simple rules β€” consider:

  • Fintokei β€” Full Japanese-language support. A staple for Japanese traders
  • Hantec Trader β€” Broker-backed (under Hantec Markets). Strong cost-efficiency in the $100K bracket
  • FTMO β€” The largest firm in the industry. Best choice if track record and payout reliability come first

You can filter all firms by their terms on the comparison page.

Will it resume?

At this point it's undecided. The official line hints at "revisiting the model after a business review," and even if it does resume, the rules and pricing are likely to change. This article will be updated if there's any movement.

Sources: ATFunded's official site announcement, LeapRate report (June 8, 2026)

Written by

Hosono P | the prop firm strategist

I buy challenges with my own money and record everything through to the payout. Recorded payouts: Β₯6.1M in total from Fintokei, Fundora and Funded7, plus $4,776 from The5ers (as of September 2026). Author of the semi-discretionary EA "ELDRA".

Profile and payout recordX @hosono_p

πŸ“šRelated articles

πŸ”

The5ers High Stakes Gets Cheaper, But the $50K/$100K Buckets Shrank | The Refund Is Now "70% Cash + 30% Non-Withdrawable Credit" [September 2026]

The5ers High Stakes revised its pricing and terms on September 14, 2026. $100K Classic went from $545 to $455, and New from $491 to $405. But only the $50K and $100K sizes saw max loss cut from 10% to 8% and daily loss from 5% to 4%, plus newly introduced withdrawal caps ($3,000/$4,000) and minimum profit requirements ($300/$500). What used to be a full fee refund is now split into 70% cash plus 30% non-withdrawable Hub credit. Measured against the loss allowance per dollar, this is effectively a price increase. On top of that, the official site shows conflicting numbers in four different places, so you need to check the actual figures at checkout before buying.

Firm comparisons9/15/2026
πŸ”

FTMO Futures Complete Guide: Automated Trading and VPS Both Officially Allowed as FX Giant Launches Futures in September 2026

A hands-on check of FTMO's official pages for FTMO Futures, the futures prop program FTMO launched on September 1, 2026. Its forbidden-practices page explicitly states "Automated trading is permitted," making it one of the few firms that also explicitly permits VPS and VPN use. Covers full pricing for every size of Growth and Pro, how EOD trailing drawdown works, the consistency rule that only applies during evaluation, the JST close-out deadline, the three platforms (NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView), and whether it's usable from Japan.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
πŸ”

FTMO Futures vs Topstep: FTMO Wins on Expected Value, Topstep Wins on Monthly Cost. If You're Running a Bot, VPS Access Is the Deciding Factor [September 2026]

We re-confirmed the rules on both the futures prop leader Topstep and FTMO Futures, which entered the market in September 2026, on September 23, 2026, and compared them. The monthly fee is less than half at Topstep, but running the same lot size through evaluation to payout for a year gives FTMO Futures Pro the higher expected value ($50K, zero edge: +$4,836 vs. +$2,519). Covers activation fees, the fact that you can only withdraw 50% of the balance, an optional daily loss limit, resets that shift your billing date, VPS eligibility, and running a bot on a live account.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
πŸ”

The5ers Futures Complete Guide: A One-Time Fee Fully Refunded on Your 3rd Payout, But Algo Trading Is Fully Banned [September 2026]

We tested The5ers's futures product directly on the official pages: pricing for all 4 sizes of Day Trade and Swing, EOD drawdown, the 40% consistency rule that applies on both evaluation and funded stages, a fixed 80/20 split, scaling up to $500K, and a full refund of the fee on your 3rd payout. However, the official FAQ explicitly states that high-frequency trading, algorithmic trading, and hedging are 'strictly forbidden, and any trader found using them will be banned from our programs' β€” so EA traders are excluded.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
πŸ”

E8 Pro vs E8 One: Which Should You Buy? Comparing "Static 8% + 2%/day cap" vs "Dynamic 6% + 40% Consistency" at the Same $366, for Both Smoothed and Spiky P&L [September 2026]

E8 Markets' E8 Pro (static DD 8%, daily 2.5%, daily profit cap 2%, payouts are 50% of profit and the fail line moves to the starting balance) and E8 One (dynamic DD 6% locked at the starting balance, daily 4%, target 9%, 40% consistency rule in Performance stage) both cost $488 at $100K β€” $366 with code E8. The answer depends on the shape of your P&L. Traders firing multiple times a day to smooth out returns come out ahead with Pro in Monte Carlo (4.5x vs 1.4x at zero edge). Traders who trade once a day and earn most of their profit from a handful of big days come out 2–7x ahead with One in real-data tests (+Β₯3.09M/+Β₯5.85M vs +Β₯630K/+Β₯1.37M per year). The reason: Pro's "2% daily profit cap" shaves 8–27% off big-day profits, and the buffer disappears on the first payout. Also covers which configuration to pick (8% for Pro, 6% for One).

Firm comparisons9/20/2026
πŸ”

Is Fintokei's SwiftTrader Plan a Trap for the Unwary? Cheap, Fast, and 90% β€” But It Recovers Its Fee Through a 60-Day, 3% Box, Measured Against the Same Strategy as StartTrader, FTMO, and E8 [September 2026]

Fintokei's SwiftTrader plan was revised on July 15, 2026, to a 6% target, -2% daily loss, -3% overall loss, a 60-day time limit, and a 90% split. Β₯20M for Β₯93,800 looks cheaper than the challenge plan, but priced per Β₯10,000 of loss allowance it's Β₯1,563 versus Β₯549 β€” 2.85x β€” and target Γ· loss allowance is 2.0 versus 0.8. In a Monte Carlo simulation, a high-frequency trader firing 3 times a day has a region where SwiftTrader wins below 0.5% risk per trade, but running the real "once a day" strategy through it shows -Β₯360K to -Β₯560K a year at 0.5%, with the 60-day window expiring 5 times a year. Run through the challenge plan, FTMO 2-Step, and E8 One with the same strategy, SwiftTrader comes in at 3-4x worse. It's overpriced for most people, and only makes sense for a narrow slice of high-frequency, high-win-rate traders.

Firm comparisons9/20/2026