πŸ” Firm comparisons

The Real Prop Firm Pass Rates: The Latest 2026 Data, Calculated From Our Database

Published: 4/23/2026

⚠️ ATFunded announced a pause of operations on June 8, 2026 (new challenge purchases are unavailable). Any mention of ATFunded in this article is a record of its rules before the pause. For the background and how refunds/payouts were handled, see the summary article.

πŸ“’ Advertising / affiliate disclosure: This article contains prop-memo.com affiliate links (marked 🎁: Fintokei / Funded7). Anyone who purchases a challenge through one of these links receives unlimited access to Hosono P's semi-discretionary EA, "ELDRA," as a gift. See Hosono P's note article for details.

Note: Prop firm rules change frequently. Always verify the latest accurate rules on each firm's official site. (Last updated: April 23, 2026)

Is "FTMO's 5% pass rate" actually true?

You'll often see figures like "FTMO is under 5%," "Fintokei is 5-7% too" quoted online for prop firm pass rates. These come from FTMO's own statements and user reports, but the number means something completely different depending on whether it's the Phase 1 pass rate alone, the rate of reaching a funded account, or the actual rate of reaching a payout.

A 2026 industry survey of 360 users produced the following results:

MetricFigure
Passed at least once, overall10.6%
Of those who passed, passed on the first attempt~24%
Of those who passed, cumulative pass rate within 2 attempts~55%
Passed after 3+ attempts~45%

In other words, talking about a "pass rate" is meaningless unless you break it into four stages: "first attempt," "cumulative," "reaching funded status," and "reaching a payout."

Real pass rates from the prop-memo.com database

This site anonymously aggregates the challenge progress and outcomes real users have logged (partially published at /stats). Pulling pass rates by phase for the major firms out of the database shows the following pattern:

FirmPhase 1 passPhase 2 passReach fundedReach payout
Fintokei 🎁MediumMediumMediumMedium-high
Funded7 🎁MediumMediumMediumMedium
The5ersMediumMediumMediumMedium
FTMOLowLowLowMedium (those who reach it do get paid)
FundoraMediumMediumMediumStill collecting data

*Note: Because the exact percentages' reliability shifts with how many entries are logged, always check the latest figures at /stats. The relative ranking is generally as shown above.

Breaking down the drop-off rate by phase

To understand pass rates correctly, it helps to break the challenge into 5 stages:

Code
Purchase β†’ Pass Phase 1 β†’ Pass Phase 2 β†’ Reach funded β†’ First payout β†’ Ongoing payouts

A typical 2-phase plan's "drop-off rate" looks like this:

StageTypical drop-offMain cause
Phase 1 (8% target)50-70%DD breach, running out of time, mental breakdown
Phase 2 (5% target)30-50%Getting too cautious and falling short of the target
Reaching funded β†’ first payout20-40%Taking too much risk, breaking the consistency rule
Ongoing payouts10-30%Discipline breaking down, a big loss

Multiplying these together, the overall pass rate from purchase to ongoing payouts comes to 5-15%, which lines up closely with the industry survey's 10.6%.

Characteristics by number of steps

  • 1-phase (including Instant): only one gate to clear, and the profit target tends to be lower (e.g., Fintokei's SwiftTrader at +6%). The pass rate is higher (30-50%), but funded-account rules tend to be strict. Note that Fintokei's SwiftTrader was tightened in a 2026 revision β€” total max loss is now -3% with a 60-day time limit β€” so even with a lower target, the real-world pass rate gets offset by the tighter DD
  • 2-phase: the most common model. Total pass rate 20-35%
  • 3-phase: Fintokei's entry-level plan and the StartTrader family. Each step's target is lower (2%/3%/6%), so each individual step is easier to clear, but there are more points where you can drop off

The trick behind firms that "look like they have a high pass rate"

Be careful of firms that get called "high pass rate" online.

Trick 1: Instant-type accounts don't have a challenge to begin with

Instant Funding (immediately funded) accounts have "no evaluation," so the concept of a pass rate doesn't even apply. In exchange, they're normally priced higher, with a lower profit cap and a tighter DD. These should be excluded from any apples-to-apples pass-rate comparison.

Trick 2: Publishing only the Phase 1 pass rate

Some firms advertise "70% Phase 1 pass rate!" β€” but that's the Phase 1 pass rate alone, not the rate of reaching a payout. The metric that actually matters is "the share of users who reached their first payout."

Trick 3: Inflating the "cumulative pass rate" with reset discounts

Firms claiming "80% of users pass eventually!" sometimes assume repeated purchases at a reset discount. Fail on attempt 1 β†’ buy attempt 2 at a discount β†’ succeed and count it as a "pass." You should judge this by the cumulative cost per user, not just the final result.

5 practical techniques to raise your first-attempt pass rate

Drawing on industry surveys plus prop-memo.com user trends, here are concrete tactics that can double your first-attempt pass rate.

1. Cut your usual lot sizing in half

Most beginners breach the DD by taking too much risk. The trap is that the more experience someone has trading FX with their own money, the more likely they are to get careless and blow it. Stick to half the lot size you'd normally use trading your own capital β€” in other words, 0.5-1% risk per trade.

2. Treat the first week as a "practice period" and don't push

Chasing the Phase 1 target on day one is the worst move you can make. Treat the first 5 trading days as a period to get a feel for your entries as if it were a demo account. Passing a week later at your own pace beats rushing and losing β€” it's better overall.

3. Turn the time limit to your advantage

On firms with a time limit (like FTMO), the classic drop-off pattern is "panicking near the deadline and taking a big loss." Pacing yourself to hit 70% of the target in the first 50% of the time leaves you room to breathe in the second half.

4. Stay flat on NFP and FOMC days

At firms with news-trading restrictions β€” FTMO, ATFunded, E8 Markets β€” even having a scalp limit order get filled can trigger a breach. Staying completely flat on major-indicator days is almost always the right call. See the scalping/news rules comparison for detail.

5. Understand the DD type before you buy

Confusing trailing DD vs. static DD can be fatal. For example, some plans (like FTMO Standard) start out static but behave differently once you're in profit. See drawdown explained completely for detail.

Choosing the right firm for you, by the numbers

Obsessing over the pass rate alone won't help if you end up choosing a firm whose rules don't suit you. Here's the template order to work through:

  1. Check whether your style fits the rules: use the MT5-supported, martingale-OK, news-OK, and scalping-OK filters at /compare
  2. Sanity-check account size vs. price: some firms charge 2x for the same account size
  3. Verify the payout track record: check real user payout data at /stats
  4. Rank by pass-rate data: refer to this article's database figures

Pass rates are something to compare in numbers, but in the end, the only traders who actually pass are the ones with the patience to follow the rules. Don't rush β€” treat every single trade with care.

Written by

Hosono P | the prop firm strategist

I buy challenges with my own money and record everything through to the payout. Recorded payouts: Β₯6.1M in total from Fintokei, Fundora and Funded7, plus $4,776 from The5ers (as of September 2026). Author of the semi-discretionary EA "ELDRA".

Profile and payout recordX @hosono_p

πŸ“šRelated articles

πŸ”

FTMO Futures Complete Guide: Automated Trading and VPS Both Officially Allowed as FX Giant Launches Futures in September 2026

A hands-on check of FTMO's official pages for FTMO Futures, the futures prop program FTMO launched on September 1, 2026. Its forbidden-practices page explicitly states "Automated trading is permitted," making it one of the few firms that also explicitly permits VPS and VPN use. Covers full pricing for every size of Growth and Pro, how EOD trailing drawdown works, the consistency rule that only applies during evaluation, the JST close-out deadline, the three platforms (NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView), and whether it's usable from Japan.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
πŸ”

FTMO Futures vs Topstep: FTMO Wins on Expected Value, Topstep Wins on Monthly Cost. If You're Running a Bot, VPS Access Is the Deciding Factor [September 2026]

We re-confirmed the rules on both the futures prop leader Topstep and FTMO Futures, which entered the market in September 2026, on September 23, 2026, and compared them. The monthly fee is less than half at Topstep, but running the same lot size through evaluation to payout for a year gives FTMO Futures Pro the higher expected value ($50K, zero edge: +$4,836 vs. +$2,519). Covers activation fees, the fact that you can only withdraw 50% of the balance, an optional daily loss limit, resets that shift your billing date, VPS eligibility, and running a bot on a live account.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
πŸ”

The5ers Futures Complete Guide: A One-Time Fee Fully Refunded on Your 3rd Payout, But Algo Trading Is Fully Banned [September 2026]

We tested The5ers's futures product directly on the official pages: pricing for all 4 sizes of Day Trade and Swing, EOD drawdown, the 40% consistency rule that applies on both evaluation and funded stages, a fixed 80/20 split, scaling up to $500K, and a full refund of the fee on your 3rd payout. However, the official FAQ explicitly states that high-frequency trading, algorithmic trading, and hedging are 'strictly forbidden, and any trader found using them will be banned from our programs' β€” so EA traders are excluded.

Firm comparisons9/22/2026
πŸ”

E8 Pro vs E8 One: Which Should You Buy? Comparing "Static 8% + 2%/day cap" vs "Dynamic 6% + 40% Consistency" at the Same $366, for Both Smoothed and Spiky P&L [September 2026]

E8 Markets' E8 Pro (static DD 8%, daily 2.5%, daily profit cap 2%, payouts are 50% of profit and the fail line moves to the starting balance) and E8 One (dynamic DD 6% locked at the starting balance, daily 4%, target 9%, 40% consistency rule in Performance stage) both cost $488 at $100K β€” $366 with code E8. The answer depends on the shape of your P&L. Traders firing multiple times a day to smooth out returns come out ahead with Pro in Monte Carlo (4.5x vs 1.4x at zero edge). Traders who trade once a day and earn most of their profit from a handful of big days come out 2–7x ahead with One in real-data tests (+Β₯3.09M/+Β₯5.85M vs +Β₯630K/+Β₯1.37M per year). The reason: Pro's "2% daily profit cap" shaves 8–27% off big-day profits, and the buffer disappears on the first payout. Also covers which configuration to pick (8% for Pro, 6% for One).

Firm comparisons9/20/2026
πŸ”

Is Fintokei's SwiftTrader Plan a Trap for the Unwary? Cheap, Fast, and 90% β€” But It Recovers Its Fee Through a 60-Day, 3% Box, Measured Against the Same Strategy as StartTrader, FTMO, and E8 [September 2026]

Fintokei's SwiftTrader plan was revised on July 15, 2026, to a 6% target, -2% daily loss, -3% overall loss, a 60-day time limit, and a 90% split. Β₯20M for Β₯93,800 looks cheaper than the challenge plan, but priced per Β₯10,000 of loss allowance it's Β₯1,563 versus Β₯549 β€” 2.85x β€” and target Γ· loss allowance is 2.0 versus 0.8. In a Monte Carlo simulation, a high-frequency trader firing 3 times a day has a region where SwiftTrader wins below 0.5% risk per trade, but running the real "once a day" strategy through it shows -Β₯360K to -Β₯560K a year at 0.5%, with the 60-day window expiring 5 times a year. Run through the challenge plan, FTMO 2-Step, and E8 One with the same strategy, SwiftTrader comes in at 3-4x worse. It's overpriced for most people, and only makes sense for a narrow slice of high-frequency, high-win-rate traders.

Firm comparisons9/20/2026
πŸ”

Web3 Prop Firms Special [September 2026] | Sorting 22 Firms β€” from On-Chain Settlement to Exchange-Backed and Prediction-Market Types β€” by 'Is This Actually On-Chain?'

New prop firms settling on Hyperliquid or Arbitrum surged in 2026. We checked 22 firms on September 20, 2026, against their official rulebooks, terms of service, and Trustpilot β€” from the on-chain settlement type (Propr, Hypernova, HyperPNL, Carrot, DojiFunded), the chain-recorded type (Vanta, Hyper Stack, Solana Funded), the on-chain payout type (Investabl, FundedHive, AI Prop), Kraken-owned Breakout / Kraken Prop / Kraken Funded, the crypto-native type (SizeProp, HyroTrader, Crypto Fund Trader, Bitfunded, TradeXProp, Upscale), to the prediction-market type using Polymarket (Funding Predicts, PropMarket). Even firms calling themselves 'on-chain' run every evaluation phase as a simulation, and each firm's terms state that whether real orders get routed to the market after funding is entirely 'at the operator's discretion.' We cover whether you can buy from Japan, what to do once you receive USDC, and where the fees hit.

Firm comparisons9/20/2026