🧪 Research

What's Eightcap Challenges' Expected Value? One Phase Beats Two Phase in a 1-Year Simulation [September 2026]

Published: 9/27/2026

※ Rules and pricing were confirmed on September 27, 2026 against Eightcap Challenges' official site and terms (Rules and Conditions V2.3, dated September 21, 2026, and the General Terms and Conditions). The assumptions and formulas are the same as in FTMO vs. The5ers vs. Fintokei vs. Hantec: expected value compared.

⚠️ Whether Japan-based traders can buy or withdraw is unconfirmed. Japan does not appear on the restricted-country list in the terms. However, third-party information suggests the parent company Eightcap's brokerage accounts are not available to Japanese residents, and we have not been able to confirm this ourselves. Contact support@challenges.eightcap.com directly before purchasing.

Conclusion

  • At 1% risk per trade and "medium" skill (55% win rate), One Phase comes out on top, at +$24,987 for the year. Two Phase came in at +$20,735.
  • One Phase has a tighter setup — a 10% target, 8% max loss, 4% daily loss — but being a single step means it reaches Funded sooner, extending the number of days you can earn. If you cap daily losses at 2.5%, you never even touch the 4% daily limit.
  • At every risk level tested (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%), One Phase came out ahead once skill was "small" or better. Two Phase only won in one single case: 0.5% risk at zero skill.
  • There's no refund on the challenge fee. Since the max-loss line doesn't move after a withdrawal, you retain the same 8% (One Phase) / 10% (Two Phase) cushion post-withdrawal.
  • At zero skill (50% win rate), only the 1.5% risk level produced a thin profit for either plan (One Phase +$3,201, Two Phase +$770); everything else was negative.

Eightcap Challenges plans ($100K equivalent)

Two PhaseOne Phase
Price (list)$599$659
Target9% → 5%10%
Daily loss5%4%
Max loss10% (static, based on initial balance)8% (static, based on initial balance)
Max loss after withdrawalDoesn't moveDoesn't move
Minimum days (evaluation)3 days per step (calendar days with a trade; min. 60-second hold)5 days (same)
Minimum days (withdrawal)5 days7 days
Consistency (Profit Distribution)35%, only at withdrawal30%, only at withdrawal
Split80% (90% add-on available)80% (90% add-on available)
Fee refundNoneNone
WithdrawalEvery 14 days from account opening / last request. Minimum $100 (after split)Same

Daily loss is calculated as "previous day's balance × the cap %," and you fail if that day's equity loss exceeds it. Max loss is a fixed percentage of the initial balance that neither balance nor equity may fall below. Two Phase's target is 9% → 5% for accounts opened on or after February 23, 2026 (accounts opened before that are 10% → 8%).

Profit Distribution is a cap, applied when you request a withdrawal, on "what share of the requested amount can come from a single day's profit." It's 30% for One Phase and 35% for Two Phase (25%/30% for accounts opened before February 11, 2026). It doesn't apply during the evaluation.

Simulation assumptions

Fixed

  • 1 year (250 trading days), max 3 trades/day, 1:1 risk/reward
  • Daily loss capped at 2.5% of initial balance across all plans (once a loss would push that day past 2.5%, no more trades that day)
  • Per-trade risk, floating loss, and daily loss are all capped at 3%
  • Position size fixed at r% of the initial balance, one position at a time
  • Cost is 5% of risk per trade (+0.95R on a win, -1.05R on a loss). In USD/JPY terms, a round-trip cost of 1.5 pips matches a 30-pip stop/target, and 2 pips matches a 40-pip stop/target
  • On failure, rebuy the same plan; no scaling; withdrawals every 14 days; year-end profit left in the account isn't counted
  • 20,000 runs per condition

Varied

  • Plan
  • Skill: 50% win rate (zero) / 52% (small) / 55% (medium) / 58% (strong)
  • Risk per trade r (0.5% / 1.0% / 1.5%)
  • Amount of profit left in the account at withdrawal (optimized per plan — the best result in every case was "withdraw everything")

Not modeled

  • The Profit Distribution rule at withdrawal (30%/35%). This simulation's engine can only apply a consistency rule to "both the evaluation and withdrawal stages" together, and can't reproduce Eightcap's actual rule of applying it only at withdrawal, so it was left out. The effect is small for evenly-sized trades, but for strategies that make most of their profit in a few big days, real withdrawal amounts would be capped more than shown here, making the true numbers worse than in this article
  • Minimum trading days at withdrawal (5 / 7 days). Since the model trades daily over a 14-day cycle, this is never triggered
  • The ban on trading 10 minutes around high-impact news at the withdrawal stage, the 10-simultaneous-position cap, and per-trade lot caps (e.g. 40 lots on FX)
  • Add-ons like the 90% split or early withdrawal

The expected-value formulas

Expected value per trade

With a 1:1 risk/reward and a cost of 5% of risk per trade (0.05R), a win nets +0.95R and a loss costs -1.05R. With win rate p:

Expected value per trade = p × 0.95R − (1 − p) × 1.05R = (2p − 1.05) × R

SkillWin rate pEV per trade
Zero50%−0.05R
Small52%−0.01R
Medium55%+0.05R
Strong58%+0.11R

Expected value per year

Annual EV = average annual payout received − average fees paid

  • Payout received = amount withdrawn × split rate (80%)
  • Fees paid = fee × number of times purchased in a year (rebuying every time you fail)
  • Eightcap Challenges doesn't refund the fee, so the "fee refunded" term is zero

Losses are capped by "fee × times purchased," while payouts from a passed account have no ceiling. Because of this shape, even a slightly negative per-trade EV can turn into a positive annual number. Since these three averages can't be derived analytically, we ran a full year of trading 20,000 times each, following the rules exactly, and averaged the results (Monte Carlo method).

In USD/JPY terms, a round-trip cost of 1.5 pips lines up with a 30-pip stop/target under this model, and 2 pips with 40 pips. On a $100K account at 1% risk per trade ($1,000), that's 5 lots at 30 pips or 3.75 lots at 40 pips. Lot size and leverage calculations are detailed in the 4-firm comparison article.

0.5% risk per trade: average annual take-home minus fees

SkillTwo PhaseOne Phase
Zero−$1,629−$1,846
Small−$277+$464
Medium+$6,568+$9,157
Strong+$21,046+$24,284

The probability of ending up in profit (medium skill) was 70% for Two Phase and 83% for One Phase.

1.0% risk per trade

SkillTwo PhaseOne Phase
Zero−$1,406−$330
Small+$3,779+$6,570
Medium+$20,735+$24,987
Strong+$48,669+$52,684

The probability of ending up in profit (medium skill) was 91% for Two Phase and 96% for One Phase.

1.5% risk per trade

At 1.5% risk per trade, a single loss puts the next loss over the 2.5% daily cap, so trading stops for the day at that point.

SkillTwo PhaseOne Phase
Zero+$770+$3,201
Small+$7,856+$12,076
Medium+$27,072+$32,862
Strong+$57,355+$63,014

The probability of ending up in profit (medium skill) was 93% for Two Phase and 97% for One Phase.

Why the gap exists

PlanWhat's driving it
One PhaseA single step, so it reaches Funded faster — extending the number of days it can generate payouts each year. A 4% daily loss cap is never touched if you stop at 2.5%
Two PhaseWider room — 10% max loss, 5% daily loss — but requires clearing two stages of 9% and 5%. $60 cheaper

At 1% risk per trade and "medium" skill, the share of runs that reached Funded at least once in the year was 99.8% for One Phase and 98.4% for Two Phase. The gap is small, but because One Phase gets there sooner, its total payouts end up larger (average annual payout: One Phase $27,684, Two Phase $22,619). Total fees paid were actually higher for One Phase ($2,697 vs. $1,884), but the payout gap outweighed it.

Since neither plan's max-loss line moves after a withdrawal, withdrawing everything every time — rather than leaving profit in the account — produced the best result in both cases.

Which to buy

Your situationRecommendation
You can cap daily losses at 2.5%One Phase
You have days with big lossesTwo Phase (5% daily loss, 10% max loss)
You often take large profits in a single dayTwo Phase (Profit Distribution is a slightly looser 35%)
You haven't confirmed whether it's usable from JapanConfirm with support before buying

EAs (automated trading) can be used on MT4, MT5, and TradeLocker. However, the terms state that if an automated or semi-automated trading error causes a failure, the account or trades won't be restored. Martingale, grid, hedging, and copy trading with others are banned.

FAQ

Q. Is Eightcap Challenges' expected value positive?

It depends on your skill. At a 55% win rate (per-trade EV +0.05R), 1% risk per trade produced +$24,987 for the year with One Phase and +$20,735 with Two Phase. At a 50% win rate (EV −0.05R), the result was negative except at the 1.5% risk level. Since the Profit Distribution rule at withdrawal isn't modeled, strategies that make most of their profit in a few big days would see worse real-world numbers than shown here.

Q. Can Eightcap Challenges be used from Japan?

Unconfirmed. Japan is not on the restricted-country list in the terms (dated September 21, 2026). However, there's third-party information suggesting the parent company Eightcap's brokerage accounts aren't available to Japanese residents. Challenges is simulated trading and is run by a separate Seychelles entity, Eightcap International Ltd, so the treatment could differ. We haven't been able to confirm this ourselves, so check with support before purchasing.

Q. Is Eightcap Challenges' fee refunded?

No. Under the terms, once the account is created and you start trading, the fee is non-refundable. It's only refunded if the account was never created. The simulation also uses zero for the refund.

Q. When can I withdraw from Eightcap Challenges?

You can request your first withdrawal 14 days after opening a Funded (Payout Stage) account, and every 14 days after your previous request from then on. Withdrawals are available from $100 (after split). At the withdrawal stage, you also need a minimum of 7 (One Phase) or 5 (Two Phase) trading days. The terms note you may be asked for a phone or video call as part of the withdrawal review.

Q. What is Profit Distribution?

It's a cap, applied when you request a withdrawal, on how much of the requested amount can come from a single day's profit. It's 30% for One Phase and 35% for Two Phase. For example, on Two Phase, if you made $3,500 in a single day, that day's profit can only cover up to 35% of your requested amount, so you'd need profit from other days too. It doesn't apply during the evaluation.

Q. I want to run this with my own assumptions

We've published the simulation engine and this article's plan config (JSON). Running python sim-prop-ev.py eightcapchallenges.json reproduces this article's tables exactly. You can change the price or split rate and rerun it (requires Python and numba).

Sources: Eightcap Challenges official site (pricing and plan table), "Rules and Conditions V2.3 (dated September 21, 2026)," "General Terms and Conditions." All confirmed September 27, 2026.

Written by

Hosono P | the prop firm strategist

I buy challenges with my own money and record everything through to the payout. Recorded payouts: ¥6.1M in total from Fintokei, Fundora and Funded7, plus $4,776 from The5ers (as of September 2026). Author of the semi-discretionary EA "ELDRA".

Profile and payout recordX @hosono_p

📚Related articles

🧪

FTMO vs. FundedElite: Which Should You Buy? | A 1-Year Simulation of 5 Plans Under the Same Assumptions Puts FTMO 1-Step on Top, With FundedElite's Lite Putting Up a Good Fight [September 2026]

A 1-year Monte Carlo comparison of FTMO (2-Step / 1-Step) and FundedElite (2-Step / 2-Step Lite / 1-Step), run strictly to the official rules of each. Covers expected value at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50–58% win rates, plus the differences in EA rules, refunds, free retries, and coupons.

Research9/28/2026
🧪

What's Alpha Capital's Expected Value? A 1-Year Simulation of Alpha One vs. Alpha Pro: Pro 10% Comes Out on Top [September 2026]

A 1-year Monte Carlo simulation of Alpha Capital Group's Alpha One (6%, 10%) and Alpha Pro 10% (On-Demand, Bi-Weekly), run exactly to the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50-58% win rates, Alpha One's trailing max loss, the consistency rule set by payout method, the lack of any fee refund, and the Max Risk Rule.

Research9/27/2026
🧪

What is Blueberry Funded's expected value? Running a 1-year simulation on Prime, 1-Step, Flex 1-Step, and Instant Elite puts Instant Elite 1st with an edge — and at the biggest loss with zero edge [September 2026]

A one-year Monte Carlo simulation of Blueberry Funded's Prime 2-Step, 1-Step, Flex 1-Step, and Instant Elite, run under the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50–58% win rates, the per-trade-idea risk cap (1% on Flex 1-Step and 1-Step, 1.5% on Instant), and Instant Elite's trailing max loss.

Research9/27/2026
🧪

What's BrightFunded's Expected Value? A 1-Year Simulation of 1-Step, 2-Step Bright, and 2-Step Classic Shows the Two 2-Steps Nearly Double the 1-Step [September 2026]

A 1-year Monte Carlo simulation of BrightFunded's 1-Step, 2-Step Bright, and 2-Step Classic ($100K) run strictly by the official rules. Covers how per-trade risk of 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% and win rates of 50-58% affect annual take-home pay, and how BrightFunded's quirks — the 1-Step's trailing max loss, no refund on the challenge fee, and a 30-day wait for the first payout — play into the result.

Research9/27/2026
🧪

What's the Expected Value of City Traders Imperium (CTI)? Running 1-Step and 2-Step for a Year Shows 2-Step on Top [September 2026]

A year-long Monte Carlo run of City Traders Imperium's (CTI) 1-Step Challenge and 2-Step Challenge ($100K) under the official rules. Covers annual net take-home at 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% risk per trade with 50–58% win rates, and how 1-Step's 5% trailing drawdown, 7-day profit-day requirement, and once-a-month payouts affect expected value.

Research9/27/2026
🧪

What's E8 Markets' Expected Value? Simulating E8 One, E8 Pro, and E8 Signature Over 1 Year: E8 Pro Wins at 1% Risk, E8 One Wins If You Size Up [September 2026]

A 1-year Monte Carlo of E8 Markets' E8 One, E8 Pro (80%/100% split), and E8 Signature, run to the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50–58% win rates, plus E8 Pro's '2% daily profit cap,' 'payouts capped at 50% of profit,' the max-loss line rising to the initial balance on the first payout, and the fact that fees are non-refundable.

Research9/27/2026