๐Ÿ“‚

All articles

138
What's FXIFY's Expected Value? A 1-Year Simulation of the 3 Two Phase Plans and One Phase Shows Classic and Pro Neck-and-Neck, Trailing Plans at Half [September 2026]
๐Ÿงช Research
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 7 min

What's FXIFY's Expected Value? A 1-Year Simulation of the 3 Two Phase Plans and One Phase Shows Classic and Pro Neck-and-Neck, Trailing Plans at Half [September 2026]

A 1-year Monte Carlo simulation of FXIFY's Two Phase (Classic / Standard / Pro) and One Phase, run under the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50-58% win rates, the fee refund, the trailing drawdown that locks at payout, and Pro's 10-day payout cycle.

#FXIFY#Expected value#Simulation
Only Two Prop Firms Can Actually Run Grid/Trailing-Repeat EAs: "Not Banned" and "Usable" Are Different Things
๐Ÿ” Firm comparisons
๐Ÿ•’ 2 wk ago๐Ÿ“– 20 min

Only Two Prop Firms Can Actually Run Grid/Trailing-Repeat EAs: "Not Banned" and "Usable" Are Different Things

If you want to run a grid or trailing-repeat ("trailing stop and repeat" / ใƒˆใƒฉใƒชใƒ”) type EA on a prop account, checking only whether the ban list mentions it doesn't tell you anything. What actually kills the account is the "floating-loss cap" and whether drawdown is measured on equity or on balance. City Traders Imperium's 1-Step is the unique combination of balance-based DD, no daily DD, off-the-shelf EAs allowed, and grid explicitly permitted. Fintokei doesn't list grid among its 9 banned practices, but off-the-shelf EAs aren't allowed and a combined 3% cap across all open positions becomes the real limit on how many grid levels you can run. A comparison table across 10 firms, plus the formula for working backward from the floating-loss cap to figure out how many levels you can stack. Confirmed against each firm's official help center on September 16, 2026.

#Averaging & martingale#EAs & automation#Comparisons+1
Hantec's 4 plans compared | Enhanced's max loss line rises to the starting balance once you withdraw. Which should you buy โ€” the 2-step or the 3-step Endurance?
๐Ÿ” Firm comparisons
๐Ÿ•’ 4 mo ago๐Ÿ“– 9 min

Hantec's 4 plans compared | Enhanced's max loss line rises to the starting balance once you withdraw. Which should you buy โ€” the 2-step or the 3-step Endurance?

A re-check of Hantec Trader's Express, Enhanced, EnhancedX, and Endurance against the official help center as of September 2026. On Enhanced and Express, the max loss line locks to the starting balance on your first payout; on EnhancedX and Endurance, it doesn't move even after a payout. Compared by price, an approximate pass rate, and how much cushion is left after a payout.

#Hantec Trader#Comparisons#Passing challenges
What's the Expected Value of Hantec Trader? Simulating Express, Enhanced, EnhancedX, and Endurance Over 1 Year, Endurance Ranks #1 [September 2026]
๐Ÿงช Research
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 8 min

What's the Expected Value of Hantec Trader? Simulating Express, Enhanced, EnhancedX, and Endurance Over 1 Year, Endurance Ranks #1 [September 2026]

We ran Hantec Trader's Express, Enhanced, EnhancedX, and Endurance through a 1-year Monte Carlo simulation using the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50โ€“58% win rates, the difference between plans whose max-loss line rises after payout versus plans where it doesn't, and how the 35% consistency rule plays out.

#Hantec Trader#Expected value#Simulation
What's the Expected Value of Hola Prime? | A 1-Year Simulation of 1-Step Prime, 2-Step Prime, and 2-Step Pro Shows Monthly 95% Wins if You Have an Edge [September 2026]
๐Ÿงช Research
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 10 min

What's the Expected Value of Hola Prime? | A 1-Year Simulation of 1-Step Prime, 2-Step Prime, and 2-Step Pro Shows Monthly 95% Wins if You Have an Edge [September 2026]

A 1-year Monte Carlo simulation of Hola Prime's 1-Step Prime, 2-Step Prime, and 2-Step Pro ($100K), run strictly to the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50โ€“58% win rates, the full fee refund (25% per payout across the first 4 payouts), the static max loss, the trade-off of the monthly 95% split, the mandatory stop loss on funded accounts, and the 2%-per-trade-idea rule.

#Hola Prime#Expected value#Simulation
What's Lark Funding's Expected Value? A 1-Year Simulation of 1-Step, 3-Step, and Instant Puts 1-Step in First (September 2026)
๐Ÿงช Research
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 8 min

What's Lark Funding's Expected Value? A 1-Year Simulation of 1-Step, 3-Step, and Instant Puts 1-Step in First (September 2026)

A 1-year Monte Carlo simulation of Lark Funding's 1-Step, 3-Step, and Instant plans, run under the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50-58% win rates, the static 7% max loss, 3-Step's lack of a daily loss limit, Instant's trailing drawdown, and how the 'Lark Base' monthly reward is handled.

#Lark Funding#Expected value#Simulation
Is Moneta Funded's Instant account really worth it? Verifying the 88% split conditions, 5% trailing DD, and consistency rule against real checkout prices [September 2026]
๐Ÿ” Firm comparisons
๐Ÿ•’ 3 wk ago๐Ÿ“– 18 min

Is Moneta Funded's Instant account really worth it? Verifying the 88% split conditions, 5% trailing DD, and consistency rule against real checkout prices [September 2026]

A deep dive into Instant Funding at Moneta Funded, the prop firm founded by the Moneta Markets founder. $5K for $69 with an 88% split from day one is real, but the split is a 60/88 choice at checkout, the max drawdown became a 5% trailing rule in July 2026, there's a 15/20% consistency rule, news trading is banned, and the first payout takes 14 days โ€” the conditions add up. Covers the differences from Instant Pro and Phoenix, a comparison against the instant accounts at FundedNext, FundingPips and Lark, Trustpilot account-closure reports, notes for traders using it from Japan, and โ€” after applying the 50%-off `TOKONATSU50` code distributed by the Japan-based BD โ€” real sale prices to answer 'which one should I actually buy.'

#Moneta Funded#Instant funding#Coupons
What's the Expected Value of Moneta Funded? Simulating 2-Step, 1-Step, Instant, and Instant Pro Over 1 Year, 1-Step Ranks #1 at 1% Risk Per Trade [September 2026]
๐Ÿงช Research
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 9 min

What's the Expected Value of Moneta Funded? Simulating 2-Step, 1-Step, Instant, and Instant Pro Over 1 Year, 1-Step Ranks #1 at 1% Risk Per Trade [September 2026]

We ran Moneta Funded's 2-Step (5%/10% and 4%/8%), 1-Step, Instant, and Instant Pro through a 1-year Monte Carlo simulation using the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50โ€“58% win rates, the refund of the fee on the 4th payout, Instant's 1% floating-loss rule, and how the max loss line locks to the initial balance once a payout is approved.

#Moneta Funded#Expected value#Simulation
Prop Firms That Allow Averaging Down (Nanpin): What the Rules Actually Ban Isn't 'Buying the Dip' โ€” It's Increasing Lot Size
๐Ÿ” Firm comparisons
๐Ÿ•’ 2 wk ago๐Ÿ“– 16 min

Prop Firms That Allow Averaging Down (Nanpin): What the Rules Actually Ban Isn't 'Buying the Dip' โ€” It's Increasing Lot Size

Averaging down (nanpin) and martingale are treated as completely different things under the rules. Funded7's Rule 4 explicitly bans 'increasing lot size from 1.0 โ†’ 1.5 โ†’ 2.0,' while explicitly allowing averaging down at the same or a reduced lot size. Fintokei lifted its martingale ban entirely in July 2025. Includes a quick-reference table of how 10 firms treat this, a formula for working backward from your floating-loss cap to the number of steps you can take, and why the room left right after the final step differs by 7.8x between averaging down and martingale even at the same 5 steps. Confirmed with each firm's official help center on September 16, 2026.

#Averaging & martingale#EAs & automation#Comparisons+1
[Up to 50% Off] Every Prop Firm First-Time Coupon Code โ€” 19 Firms, April 2026 Edition
๐Ÿ” Firm comparisons
๐Ÿ•’ 5 mo ago๐Ÿ“– 6 min

[Up to 50% Off] Every Prop Firm First-Time Coupon Code โ€” 19 Firms, April 2026 Edition

Fintokei, FundedNext's VIBES 30%... We checked every code โ€” including ones from overseas aggregator sites โ€” and kept only the ones that actually work. A full table of first-time discounts across 19 firms, plus why you should use them on a $100K account.

#Coupons#FTMO#Fintokei+1
How to connect multiple prop firm accounts at once in NinjaTrader: running FTMO Futures and FundedNext Futures on a single NinjaTrader [September 2026]
โš™๏ธ Tools & automation
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 7 min

How to connect multiple prop firm accounts at once in NinjaTrader: running FTMO Futures and FundedNext Futures on a single NinjaTrader [September 2026]

Tradovate-based futures props like FTMO Futures and FundedNext Futures each issue a separate NinjaTrader login per firm. This walks through the exact steps used to connect accounts from multiple firms at once on a single NinjaTrader 8 (turning on Multi-provider in Settings and adding a 'NinjaTrader' connection for each firm).

#FTMO Futures#FundedNext Futures#NinjaTrader+3
What is PipFarm's expected value? Running a 1-year simulation on the 4 Classic/Consistency plans puts the cheapest, Consistency 1-Stage, in 1st place [September 2026]
๐Ÿงช Research
๐Ÿ•’ 4 days ago๐Ÿ“– 9 min

What is PipFarm's expected value? Running a 1-year simulation on the 4 Classic/Consistency plans puts the cheapest, Consistency 1-Stage, in 1st place [September 2026]

A one-year Monte Carlo simulation of PipFarm's Classic (2-Stage / 1-Stage) and Consistency (2-Stage / 1-Stage) plans, run under the official rules. Covers annual take-home at 0.5%/1%/1.5% risk per trade and 50โ€“58% win rates, plus a split that starts at 70%, payout caps starting at 3%, and a mechanism that shrinks your max-loss cushion starting from your second payout.

#PipFarm#Expected value#Simulation