All articles
138![[May 2026 Edition] 7 Best Futures Prop Firms for Japanese Traders โ With Coupon and Discount Codes](/og/en/futures-prop-firms-japan-2026.png)
[May 2026 Edition] 7 Best Futures Prop Firms for Japanese Traders โ With Coupon and Discount Codes
A curated comparison of 7 firms: Apex, Topstep, MyFundedFutures, Take Profit Trader, Lucid Trading, Bulenox, and Tradeify. Covers monthly billing vs. one-time purchase, profit splits, payout conditions, and the latest coupon codes from a Japanese trader's perspective.
![[September 2026] I Calculated Lucid Trading's Expected Value โ At Zero Edge, Go Flex (With Daily Loss); With an Edge, Go Daily (No Payout Cap)](/og/en/lucid-trading-expected-value-2026-09.png)
[September 2026] I Calculated Lucid Trading's Expected Value โ At Zero Edge, Go Flex (With Daily Loss); With an Edge, Go Daily (No Payout Cap)
We compared Lucid Trading's 3 plans (Flex, Pro, Daily) with a 1-year Monte Carlo simulation running from evaluation through payout. Prices, reset fees, max loss, and payout conditions confirmed on the official Help Center and pricing page on September 23, 2026. All are one-time purchases with no activation fee. At zero edge, Flex $50K with a daily loss limit attached comes to +$2,152/year; with an edge, Daily โ which has no payout cap โ pulls ahead. Covers why adding a daily loss limit makes it cheaper, Daily's mandatory flat position around news releases, and the lack of any VPS policy.
![[2026 Complete Guide] MyFundedFutures Full Review | All 4 Plans Compared, Pricing, Rules, Payouts, and Every Coupon](/og/en/myfundedfutures-complete-guide-2026.png)
[2026 Complete Guide] MyFundedFutures Full Review | All 4 Plans Compared, Pricing, Rules, Payouts, and Every Coupon
A deep dive into MyFundedFutures (MFFU), the futures prop firm leader with a 4.9-star Trustpilot rating from 16,000+ reviews. Covers the Core/Rapid/Pro/Flex plans, EOD drawdown, consistency rule, the $5Kโ$11,250 payout caps, and every current coupon, written for Japanese traders.
![[September 2026] We Calculated MyFundedFutures' Expected Value | Builder at Zero Edge, Rapid EOD (No Payout Cap) Once You Have an Edge](/og/en/myfundedfutures-expected-value-2026-09.png)
[September 2026] We Calculated MyFundedFutures' Expected Value | Builder at Zero Edge, Rapid EOD (No Payout Cap) Once You Have an Edge
We compared MyFundedFutures' (MFFU) 4 plans (Builder, Rapid, Rapid EOD, Pro) with a Monte Carlo simulation running a full year from evaluation through payouts. Price, max loss, and payout conditions confirmed against the official help center and pricing pages on September 23, 2026. Since August 2026 it's a one-time purchase with no activation fee. At zero edge, Builder $50K comes out at +$1,658/year; with an edge, the uncapped Rapid EOD, Rapid, and Pro pull ahead. Also covers the fact that there's no VPS policy written anywhere, and that reset fees aren't disclosed.
MyFundedPerps Measured Firsthand | 3 Plans Are Rule-for-Rule Identical to Breakout Prop โ the Difference Is Price and an Official API
On September 23, 2026, I measured every number for MyFundedPerps โ the crypto perpetuals prop firm that joined the MyFundedFutures family โ directly from the official site and documentation. The surprise: the profit target, max DD, and daily loss on its 3 plans match Breakout Prop's 3 plans exactly (9%/3%, 12%/5%, 10%/6%, daily loss 3% across the board). At list price it's 9% more expensive than Breakout; only during the 20% sale does it become 13% cheaper. The biggest differences are an official REST API and sandbox, and access to 127 symbols including gold and stocks. Track record, though, is close to zero โ 37 Trustpilot reviews, profile opened September 2026 โ and there's a trap where the max-loss line permanently locks to the starting balance after your first withdrawal.
![The5ers Futures Complete Guide: A One-Time Fee Fully Refunded on Your 3rd Payout, But Algo Trading Is Fully Banned [September 2026]](/og/en/the5ers-futures-guide-2026-09.png)
The5ers Futures Complete Guide: A One-Time Fee Fully Refunded on Your 3rd Payout, But Algo Trading Is Fully Banned [September 2026]
We tested The5ers's futures product directly on the official pages: pricing for all 4 sizes of Day Trade and Swing, EOD drawdown, the 40% consistency rule that applies on both evaluation and funded stages, a fixed 80/20 split, scaling up to $500K, and a full refund of the fee on your 3rd payout. However, the official FAQ explicitly states that high-frequency trading, algorithmic trading, and hedging are 'strictly forbidden, and any trader found using them will be banned from our programs' โ so EA traders are excluded.
![The5ers Futures vs FTMO Futures: Comparing Two FX Giants' Futures Launch by Automated Trading Policy [September 2026]](/og/en/the5ers-futures-vs-ftmo-futures-2026-09.png)
The5ers Futures vs FTMO Futures: Comparing Two FX Giants' Futures Launch by Automated Trading Policy [September 2026]
The5ers and FTMO have both launched futures products. On September 22, 2026 we measured prices and rules for every size on both official sites. The decisive difference is automated trading: The5ers' FAQ states outright, "algorithmic trading is strictly forbidden, and users will be banned from our programs," while FTMO states, "there is no reason to restrict discretionary trading, algorithmic trading, or EAs." FTMO also explicitly allows VPS and VPN, which puts it ahead of the dedicated futures firms if you plan to run an EA around the clock. We line both up against the same 26 US futures props on cost per unit of loss buffer, EOD drawdown, the scope of the consistency rule, and payout caps.
![[September 2026] I calculated Topstep's expected value โ it loses to FTMO Futures at the same lot size; you only win by sizing up big with no daily loss limit](/og/en/topstep-expected-value-2026-09.png)
[September 2026] I calculated Topstep's expected value โ it loses to FTMO Futures at the same lot size; you only win by sizing up big with no daily loss limit
Ran a full year of Monte Carlo simulation from Topstep's Trading Combine through the Express Funded Account to payouts. Confirmed the monthly fee, resets, activation fee, max loss, and withdrawal conditions on the official help center on September 23, 2026. At $50K and 0.30 lots, zero edge comes out to +$2,519/year โ about half of FTMO Futures Pro. Without a daily loss limit you can size up to 0.50 lots and flip the result, but that needs 25โ39 resets a year. Also compares with/without the activation fee, Standard vs. Consistency, and with/without a daily loss limit.
![What is Propr? A Full Breakdown of the On-Chain Prop Firm Built on Hyperliquid | From $25, 15.4% Pass Rate Published, USDC Payouts [September 2026]](/og/en/propr-onchain-crypto-prop-firm-guide-2026.png)
What is Propr? A Full Breakdown of the On-Chain Prop Firm Built on Hyperliquid | From $25, 15.4% Pass Rate Published, USDC Payouts [September 2026]
A look at Propr, a crypto prop firm developed by XBorg and backed by SwissBorg, running directly on Hyperliquid's order book. Four plans ($5Kโ$200K, from $25), an 80% fixed split, a public dashboard showing a median 38-minute USDC payout time, $2.95M in revenue, and a 15.4% pass rate. On the other hand, the fee is 25โ36% more than the identically-structured Kraken-backed Breakout, and at $140โ167 per $1,000 of loss allowance it's roughly 3x an FX two-step. Terms state the accounts are '100% simulated' and payouts are 'discretionary,' leverage on FX perps is 25x, and there are mismatches between the FAQ and the rulebook numbers. Covers access from Japan and things FX traders should watch for.
![E8 Pro vs E8 One: Which Should You Buy? Comparing "Static 8% + 2%/day cap" vs "Dynamic 6% + 40% Consistency" at the Same $366, for Both Smoothed and Spiky P&L [September 2026]](/og/en/e8-pro-vs-e8-one-2026-09.png)
E8 Pro vs E8 One: Which Should You Buy? Comparing "Static 8% + 2%/day cap" vs "Dynamic 6% + 40% Consistency" at the Same $366, for Both Smoothed and Spiky P&L [September 2026]
E8 Markets' E8 Pro (static DD 8%, daily 2.5%, daily profit cap 2%, payouts are 50% of profit and the fail line moves to the starting balance) and E8 One (dynamic DD 6% locked at the starting balance, daily 4%, target 9%, 40% consistency rule in Performance stage) both cost $488 at $100K โ $366 with code E8. The answer depends on the shape of your P&L. Traders firing multiple times a day to smooth out returns come out ahead with Pro in Monte Carlo (4.5x vs 1.4x at zero edge). Traders who trade once a day and earn most of their profit from a handful of big days come out 2โ7x ahead with One in real-data tests (+ยฅ3.09M/+ยฅ5.85M vs +ยฅ630K/+ยฅ1.37M per year). The reason: Pro's "2% daily profit cap" shaves 8โ27% off big-day profits, and the buffer disappears on the first payout. Also covers which configuration to pick (8% for Pro, 6% for One).
![Is Fintokei's SwiftTrader Plan a Trap for the Unwary? Cheap, Fast, and 90% โ But It Recovers Its Fee Through a 60-Day, 3% Box, Measured Against the Same Strategy as StartTrader, FTMO, and E8 [September 2026]](/og/en/fintokei-swifttrader-worth-it-2026-09.png)
Is Fintokei's SwiftTrader Plan a Trap for the Unwary? Cheap, Fast, and 90% โ But It Recovers Its Fee Through a 60-Day, 3% Box, Measured Against the Same Strategy as StartTrader, FTMO, and E8 [September 2026]
Fintokei's SwiftTrader plan was revised on July 15, 2026, to a 6% target, -2% daily loss, -3% overall loss, a 60-day time limit, and a 90% split. ยฅ20M for ยฅ93,800 looks cheaper than the challenge plan, but priced per ยฅ10,000 of loss allowance it's ยฅ1,563 versus ยฅ549 โ 2.85x โ and target รท loss allowance is 2.0 versus 0.8. In a Monte Carlo simulation, a high-frequency trader firing 3 times a day has a region where SwiftTrader wins below 0.5% risk per trade, but running the real "once a day" strategy through it shows -ยฅ360K to -ยฅ560K a year at 0.5%, with the 60-day window expiring 5 times a year. Run through the challenge plan, FTMO 2-Step, and E8 One with the same strategy, SwiftTrader comes in at 3-4x worse. It's overpriced for most people, and only makes sense for a narrow slice of high-frequency, high-win-rate traders.
![Web3 Prop Firms Special [September 2026] | Sorting 22 Firms โ from On-Chain Settlement to Exchange-Backed and Prediction-Market Types โ by 'Is This Actually On-Chain?'](/og/en/web3-prop-firms-guide-2026-09.png)
Web3 Prop Firms Special [September 2026] | Sorting 22 Firms โ from On-Chain Settlement to Exchange-Backed and Prediction-Market Types โ by 'Is This Actually On-Chain?'
New prop firms settling on Hyperliquid or Arbitrum surged in 2026. We checked 22 firms on September 20, 2026, against their official rulebooks, terms of service, and Trustpilot โ from the on-chain settlement type (Propr, Hypernova, HyperPNL, Carrot, DojiFunded), the chain-recorded type (Vanta, Hyper Stack, Solana Funded), the on-chain payout type (Investabl, FundedHive, AI Prop), Kraken-owned Breakout / Kraken Prop / Kraken Funded, the crypto-native type (SizeProp, HyroTrader, Crypto Fund Trader, Bitfunded, TradeXProp, Upscale), to the prediction-market type using Polymarket (Funding Predicts, PropMarket). Even firms calling themselves 'on-chain' run every evaluation phase as a simulation, and each firm's terms state that whether real orders get routed to the market after funding is entirely 'at the operator's discretion.' We cover whether you can buy from Japan, what to do once you receive USDC, and where the fees hit.